
Title: Shenandoah Valley
Source: Virginia Historical Society
More informationThe Shenandoah Valley in
western Virginia stretches about 140 miles north to south between the Allegheny
Mountains on the west and the Blue Ridge Mountains on the east. During the American Civil War (1861–1865), the
strategically important Valley was the site of two major campaigns and numerous
battles and represents, in microcosm, many of the military, social, and cultural
factors that ultimately explain why the Union won and the Confederacy lost the war.
Confederate control of the Shenandoah helped prolong the Confederate war effort until
1864, while the region provided sustenance to Confederate stomachs and succored
Confederate nationalism. When those connections were destroyed by Union general Philip H. Sheridan and his Valley Campaign in the
autumn of 1864—a campaign that culminated in what residents called "the
Burning," and that also helped U.S. president Abraham Lincoln win re-election—victory
for the Union and defeat for the Confederacy were all but assured. The Valley,
meanwhile, was largely stripped, but for years it had been steeped in mythology—known
as the "Granary of the Confederacy," it was considered the very heart of the South.
That mythology would survive Sheridan and even the war.

Title: Portrait of General
"Stonewall" Jackson
Source: Virginia Historical Society
More informationTechnically speaking, the Shenandoah Valley
is the northern part of the Great Valley of Virginia, approximately a 140-mile
corridor extending north from Rockbridge County to the Potomac River. The valley lies between the Blue
Ridge Mountains on the east and the Alleghenies on the west, its breadth never
wider than twenty-five miles. The forks of the Shenandoah River flow northward to
join above Massanutten Mountain—a massive topographical feature that divides the
Valley and dominates its landscape—and then move as one to a splendorous junction
with the Potomac River at Harpers
Ferry.
By 1860, and thanks in part to antebellum travel and adventure literature, plantation fiction, and romantic landscape art, the Shenandoah Valley was already a unique and "Southern" place in popular imagination. Its associations were arcadian: admirers called it a place of unrivaled beauty, pastoral tranquility, and plenteous abundance. Those associations were given vital force in the war's early years by the exploits of such Confederate heroes as Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson and Turner Ashby; in fact, one historian has suggested that the Valley possessed a revitalizing power for Confederate soldiers and civilians alike.
Despite its Confederate identity, however, the Shenandoah Valley was home to a substantial number of reluctant secessionists before the war, as well as a considerable population of Unionists, pacifists, and free blacks during the conflict. The divisions—which centered on political and economic factors, long-simmering intrastate jealously, and the uneven distribution of slavery in the region—make any generalization a tenuous one.
![Title: Jackson's Army in
Winchester, Virginia
Source: Virginia Historical Society
[2000.165.3.N] Title: Jackson's Army in
Winchester, Virginia
Source: Virginia Historical Society
[2000.165.3.N]](http://web3.encyclopediavirginia.org/resourcespace/filestore/1/9/9_e1732797d7022f3/199thm_ebf07f951f01dc4.jpg?v=2011-11-14+14%3A45%3A18)
Title: Jackson's Army in
Winchester, Virginia
Source: Virginia Historical Society
[2000.165.3.N]
More informationThe Valley's fissures would eventually be
manifested in several illuminating ways that not only called forth the
contradictions in its idyllic identity, but paradoxically may have fed and
energized them: an ongoing partisan war that occasionally devolved into brutish
guerrilla warfare; the breakdown of key political and social institutions; a
debilitating mistrust among erstwhile neighbors; and plethoric incidents of theft,
arson, intimidation, and murder. Winchester, at the head of the Valley and the Shenandoah's most
important town, was said to have changed hands more than seventy times. Indeed,
the Valley's two northernmost counties, Berkeley and Jefferson—the former's seat, Martinsburg, was a bastion of
Union sentiment; the latter, heavily Confederate and the self-proclaimed "Garden
Spot of Virginia"—were detached in 1863 and subsequently shoe-horned into the new
state of West Virginia.
The geography of the Shenandoah Valley was a military mirror: the advantages it
gave to one side were reflected in the advantages it offered the other. As the
western flank of Union operations in 
Title: Jackson's Victory at
Port Republic
Source: The Museum of the Confederacy
More informationcentral Virginia, the Shenandoah provided the Union high command with a
potential back-door route into Richmond, the Confederate capital, while it circumvented the obstacles
that were Virginia's eastern rivers. Further, to hold the valley was to bottle up
and contain the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia. (Broadening the map broadened the Valley's
importance: it could be used as a staging area into Unionist east Tennessee,
always a priority for Lincoln.)
Those advantages transposed Confederate ones. Because the Valley's direction is generally southwest to northeast, it pointed dagger-like at the North and especially at Washington, D.C., only sixty miles from Harpers Ferry. For the Confederates, to control it was to control a pressure point, a natural and physically protected invasion route northward. It was precisely this advantage that Jackson so aggressively seized in the Valley Campaign of 1862, in which his small army exploited the landscape to flummox more than 60,000 Union troops, threaten invasion and the U.S. capital, and thereby harass and stall the Union effort to capture Richmond.
On two other notable occasions, the Gettysburg Campaign of 1863 and Jubal A. Early's raid on Washington in 1864, Confederates used the Valley to undertake offensive operations in the North. Further, as the so-called "Granary of the Confederacy"—the name suggests the increasingly powerful linkage between antebellum pastoral imagery and Confederate nationalism—the Shenandoah's abundance supplied wheat, corn, meat, and especially draft animals to the Confederate war effort.
Stymied by ill-starred commanders and an uncoordinated grand strategy, the Union high command was slow to use its advantages. Finally, and in part because the Shenandoah had become what one scholar called an "iconic Confederate place," the Union chose to take away enemy advantages rather than claim its own. This decision played out spasmodically, in stages, as the larger Valley Campaign of 1864 unfolded.

Title: VMI After Hunter's Raid
Source: Virginia Military Institute
Archives
More informationOn May 15, 1864, a small Confederate force
that included 257 cadets from the Virginia
Military Institute in Lexington turned back the first Union offensive of the spring by
defeating Union general Franz Sigel at the Battle of New Market. A second Union army under
David Hunter succeeded in
moving up the Valley all the way to Lexington, where on June 12 Hunter burned VMI
as well as the home of former Virginia governor John Letcher.
Hunter, opposed in his front by a Confederate force under Early sent from Petersburg to stop him and from behind by ravenous partisans and guerrillas who disrupted his supply lines, chose to leave the valley and retreat into West Virginia. That movement reopened the Shenandoah Valley to Confederate control and made possible Early's raid on Washington in July. Early's movement, though unsustainable, brought to a head three summers of frustration in the Union high command and set the stage for a climatic, fiery autumn of holocaust.
![Title: Sheridan's Army Pursues
Early's Troops
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division [cph
3g05797] Title: Sheridan's Army Pursues
Early's Troops
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division [cph
3g05797]](http://web3.encyclopediavirginia.org/resourcespace/filestore/3/3/9_ee1b5fbd4a2be78/339thm_fa5c94cca5b977e.jpg?v=2011-11-14+14%3A51%3A44)
Title: Sheridan's Army Pursues
Early's Troops
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division [cph
3g05797]
More informationThe Burning was carried out by Union
general Sheridan, who replaced Hunter in August with orders to "follow [Early] to
the death." Sheridan defeated Early at the Third Battle of Winchester and at Fisher's Hill
in September and then embarked on a war against the land. Taking heed of Ulysses S. Grant's mandate to
make the Shenandoah Valley so desolate that crows flying over it would have to
carry their own provender, Sheridan claimed to have slaughtered thousands of
sheep, hogs, and cattle and laid in ashes "2,000 barns filled with wheat, hay, and
farming implements [and] over seventy mills filled with flour and wheat."
The devastation followed a line of forty miles between Harrisonburg in Rockingham County to Woodstock in Shenandoah County and accomplished first in Virginia what William T. Sherman would later accomplish in Georgia: by waging a so-called hard war on the land, a war in which it was undeniably apparent that the Confederacy could not stop him, Sheridan scorched the material and emotional heart of the Confederacy. Early's attempt to prove otherwise failed spectacularly at the Battle of Cedar Creek on October 19, 1864, an emphatic, demoralizing Confederate defeat and the last major military operation in the valley until the close of the war.
Historians disagree about the truth of Sheridan's assertions. At a basic level,
some argue that Sheridan did not destroy as much as he claimed to have destroyed;
to these scholars, his assertions were one measure propaganda and two dollops
personal promotion. Others insist that the Shenandoah Valley's abundance has been
exaggerated—and thus the importance of the Burning has been exaggerated as well.
According to this thesis, the 
Title: The Hoof of Turner
Ashby's Horse
Source: The Museum of the Confederacy,
Richmond, Virginia.
Photography by Alan Thompson
More information"Granary of
the Confederacy" was largely stripped of its resources by late 1862. Still others,
seeking to understand Sheridan's campaign as part of a larger effort to frame the
scale and character of the war, argue that his effort was not wanton waste-laying
but specific, targeted, and controlled. Hence, to them, neither the Burning nor
the war itself was "total" or even "brutal."
Those who lived through the Burning—those who experienced it as well as many of those who carried it out—tended to think in terms that mock contemporary historical controversy. Not only was the Burning understood as a culminating climax to a brutalizing war, it was understood that way precisely because the mythic, arcadian identity of the Shenandoah Valley had taken such deep root. Moreover, the wartime experience in the Shenandoah Valley had generated an intense if uneasy nationalism that tied these idyllic ideas of home and place to the Confederate war effort. In many ways the Burning succeeded in destroying those material ties only to see them endure spiritually in folklore and memory.
First published: April 30, 2009 | Last modified: September 15, 2010
Email Signup