![Title: Jeff. Davis in
Prison
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division [ppmsca
23848], cph 3a11321 Title: Jeff. Davis in
Prison
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division [ppmsca
23848], cph 3a11321](http://web3.encyclopediavirginia.org/resourcespace/filestore/1/7/2/1_e39902fd34906a5/1721thm_bf47474fe64fca6.jpg?v=2012-01-04+15%3A00%3A37)
Title: Jeff. Davis in
Prison
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division [ppmsca
23848], cph 3a11321
More informationUnion cavalrymen arrested former Confederate president Jefferson Davis near Irwinville,
Georgia, on May 10, 1865. Davis was taken into custody as a suspect in the
assassination of United States president Abraham Lincoln, but his arrest and two-year
imprisonment at Fort Monroe in
Virginia raised significant questions about the political course of Reconstruction (1865–1877).
Debate over Davis's fate tended to divide between those who favored a severe
punishment of the former Confederate political leaders and those who favored a more
conciliatory approach. When investigators failed to establish a link between Davis
and the Lincoln assassins, the U.S. government charged him instead with treason. U.S.
president Andrew Johnson's impeachment hearings delayed the trial, however, and in
the end the government granted Davis amnesty.
Davis spent two years as a military prisoner at Fort Monroe near Norfolk. Confined to a small room known as a casemate, he was monitored by soldiers who ensured that he ate, made no escape attempt, and did not commit suicide. Later, Davis was moved to spacious quarters in the officers' hall and was allowed visitors and exercise. In May 1866, his wife, Varina Howell Davis, took up permanent residence at Fort Monroe. Although an unauthorized biography suggested that Davis was treated poorly, Davis himself did not believe that to be the case. He was transferred to civilian custody on May 13, 1867, and then released on $100,000 bail.
Americans were divided on how or whether to punish Davis. The government could prosecute Davis for alleged participation in the Lincoln assassination, for the mistreatment of Union prisoners of war, or for leading a rebellion against the United States. U.S. president Andrew Johnson favored murder charges. Many abolitionists and lawmakers opposed punishing Davis, and instead preferred a Reconstruction plan that would punish the former Confederacy. Yet many civilians wrote the president asking for Davis to be hanged; some even volunteered to construct the gallows. The Davis issue remained prominent in public discussion in 1865 until it gave way to other Reconstruction issues, such as the rights of black freedmen. When the Lincoln conspirators' trial failed to establish a connection to Davis, Johnson settled on treason charges.
The government charged Davis with treason against the United States for organizing and arming the 1864 military invasions of Maryland and the District of Columbia during the American Civil War (1861–1865). The defendant demanded a trial as the best forum for proving the constitutionality of secession, and the government requested numerous delays to prepare its case. Although the indictment was finished in March 1868, the Johnson impeachment further delayed the case. The court finally heard preliminary motions in December 1868, when the defense asked for a dismissal claiming that the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution already punished Davis by preventing him from holding public office in the future and that further prosecution and punishment would violate the double jeopardy restriction of the Fifth Amendment. The court divided in its official opinion and certified the question to the United States Supreme Court. Fearing the court would rule in favor of Davis, Johnson released an amnesty proclamation on December 25, 1868, issuing a pardon to all persons who had participated in the rebellion.
After enduring two years of imprisonment and nearly four years of uncertainty, Davis became a free man. The incomplete prosecution of his case and others' gave clear indication that the government intended Reconstruction to realign southern society rather than punish a select few leaders for causing the rebellion.
First published: March 9, 2010 | Last modified: February 2, 2012
Email Signup