![Title: Dan River Mills
Postcard
Source: Virginia Historical Society
[1999.17.2003] Title: Dan River Mills
Postcard
Source: Virginia Historical Society
[1999.17.2003]](http://web3.encyclopediavirginia.org/resourcespace/filestore/1/2/9/5_476ef2b0163b62f/1295thm_a4ea9e2a19c2dc1.jpg?v=2011-11-14+15%3A43%3A29)
Title: Dan River Mills
Postcard
Source: Virginia Historical Society
[1999.17.2003]
More informationDan River Mills in Danville, Virginia, is a historic manufacturer of apparel fabrics and home
fashion products such as bedding. Opened in 1882 as the Riverside Cotton Mills, the
company grew to become the largest textile firm in the South. The mills were a prime
target for union leaders, who reasoned that they could organize textile plants across
the region if they could crack the strategically located Dan River Mills. In 1930 and
1951, major strikes occurred at the mills; both ended in defeat for the workers. From
the 1970s, employment levels at the Virginia firm fell dramatically as it struggled
to compete with cheap imported textiles, competition that eventually brought the
historic firm to final dissolution in 2006.
![Title: Noon-hour at the
Riverside Cotton Mills
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division
[nclc.02171] Title: Noon-hour at the
Riverside Cotton Mills
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division
[nclc.02171]](http://web3.encyclopediavirginia.org/resourcespace/filestore/1/1/8/2_485a646739a495b/1182thm_4477d917200f151.jpg?v=2011-11-14+15%3A34%3A40)
Title: Noon-hour at the
Riverside Cotton Mills
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division
[nclc.02171]
More informationEstablished by six local men on the banks of the Dan River in 1882, Riverside
Cotton Mills expanded rapidly, with four mills built within the company's first
decade of operations. In 1895 a group that included five of the six original
founders also set up the Dan River Power and Manufacturing Company so that they
could develop the water power of the Dan River. In 1909, Riverside and Dan River merged to form the Riverside
and Dan River Cotton Mills. By then, annual production of cloth had risen to more
than 78 million yards, up from just 2 million yards in 1884. The company continued
to expand, in particular by moving into the manufacturing of sheetings, ginghams,
and chambrays.
Even before the merger, Riverside Cotton Mills in Danville was the largest textile mill in the South. Like most southern textile companies at this time, Riverside developed a mill village for its workers, providing housing in order to retain labor that had been recruited from the surrounding areas. Named after three brothers who had helped to found the company, the mill village of Schoolfield was independent of the city of Danville until annexation in 1951. Although conditions in Schoolfield were harsh—it did not have a sewage system until it was annexed by Danville—many residents embraced the close community that existed in the old mill village.
![Title: Dinner-toters at the
Riverside Cotton Mills
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division
[nclc.02168] Title: Dinner-toters at the
Riverside Cotton Mills
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division
[nclc.02168]](http://web3.encyclopediavirginia.org/resourcespace/filestore/1/1/6/5_c45ac53d5270359/1165thm_65c55ddbf4bab30.jpg?v=2011-11-14+15%3A33%3A52)
Title: Dinner-toters at the
Riverside Cotton Mills
Source: Library of Congress Prints &
Photographs Division
[nclc.02168]
More informationIn the 1920s, Riverside gained national publicity through its efforts to implement
"industrial democracy." The brainchild of company president H. R. Fitzgerald, the
scheme was modeled after the federal government and it allowed a workers' House of
Representatives to introduce legislation that addressed their grievances. Although
industrial democracy did help to address small issues, its limitations were
exposed when the company began to cut wages late in the 1920s, and the scheme
itself was terminated in 1930. Seeking higher wages and more autonomy, workers
joined the United Textile
Workers of America in large numbers, eventually walking out on strike on
September 29, 1930. The dispute generated a considerable amount of violence and
bitterness, especially as some strikers were evicted from their company-owned
houses. After four months, the strikers returned to work, partly because the union
was running out of funds to feed them. In addition, many workers had broken the
picket line even before the walkout was abandoned.

Title: Dan River Cotton Mill
Source: Special Collections,
University of Virginia
More informationFollowing the lean years of the 1930s, in which net earnings averaged less than
half a million dollars per year, the mills thrived during World War II (1939–1945)
by fulfilling orders for the military. By 1942, the company operated twelve
weaving and spinning mills, together with dyeing, bleaching, finishing, and power
plants. These mills contained nearly half a million spindles, allowing the company
to easily retain its position as the biggest textile firm in the region. At this
time, the mills dominated life in Danville, employing 14,000 workers in a town of
about 40,000 people. When the war ended, the newly chartered Dan River Mills
Incorporated continued to thrive by fulfilling pent-up civilian demand for
textiles. After making several acquisitions in the 1950s, the firm began to
operate manufacturing facilities in other southern states, moves that pushed
company-wide employment levels to more than 18,000 in 1956. Following passage of
the 1964 Civil Rights
Act, which prohibited racial discrimination in employment, the company
also hired more African American workers and gradually placed them in a range of
positions that had previously been reserved for whites.
Hoping to capitalize on the strong economic position that prevailed across the industry, the Textile Workers Union of America called a strike across the South in the spring of 1951. As a traditional wage setter for the industry, Dan River Mills played a crucial role in the walkout, which affected mills in seven southern states. The company's refusal to grant the union's demands for a 12 percent base pay raise exposed the TWUA's weaknesses and ensured that it largely lost the ability to influence wage levels in the region. At Dan River itself, the local union, which had been organized during World War II, survived the strike but it never again had the same level of power, especially since the company now refused to deduct workers' dues automatically.
For Dan River and other U.S. textile makers, the good economic times did not last. Starting in the 1960s, imported textiles gradually began to take away market share from American textile makers. Like other companies, Dan River initially responded by investing heavily in new technology in order to stay competitive. In the 1990s and early in the 2000s, however, the industry collapsed, hit by a surge of imports from Latin America and Asia. Ignoring the industry's calls for protection, U.S. policymakers signed a series of free trade agreements with developing countries, insisting that these deals would help exporters and lead to cheaper prices for consumers.
After steady declines in employment levels in the 1980s and 1990s, in March 2004 Dan River went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. It was a move that led to the closure of a number of its facilities, including the finishing and sheet-sewing plants in Danville. Although it emerged from bankruptcy a year later, early in 2006 Dan River was bought by Gujarat Heavy Chemicals, an Indian chemical firm that quickly closed the main mill and moved the remaining 500 jobs overseas. As with so many historic American firms, the Dan River brand survived but it was no longer made in the United States. In November 2008, the company's familiar smokestacks were toppled by an implosion, removing one of the main physical vestiges of Danville's long textile heritage.
First published: September 17, 2009 | Last modified: September 15, 2010
Email Signup